# Adding a 2Pool base implementation of USDC/USDT

**URL:** <http://gov.curve.finance/t/adding-a-2pool-base-implementation-of-usdc-usdt/3000>\
**Category:** Proposals\
**Created:** [April 2, 2022, 4:28pm UTC](http://gov.curve.finance/t/adding-a-2pool-base-implementation-of-usdc-usdt/3000 "2022-04-02T16:28:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlockEnthusiast](http://gov.curve.finance/user_avatar/gov.curve.finance/blockenthusiast/32/1621_2.png) [@BlockEnthusiast](http://gov.curve.finance/u/BlockEnthusiast)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2022, 7:48pm UTC](http://gov.curve.finance/t/adding-a-2pool-base-implementation-of-usdc-usdt/3000/2 "2022-04-02T19:48:26Z")

</div>

I think 2pool makes sense, and increases the capital efficiency of pools connected to it.

However in my opinion it makes sense to make this base pool natively connected to AAVE or Compound lending.

A yield bouncer feels like it adds too much risk, but base lending feels relatively safe at this point.

---

_[View the full topic](http://gov.curve.finance/t/adding-a-2pool-base-implementation-of-usdc-usdt/3000)._